Study reveals lower grades, higher costs for copper production in 2012

July 22, 2013

SNL Metals Economics Group’s recently released Strategies for Copper Reserves Replacement Study reveals that lower copper grades and higher taxation, royalty, and environmental approval costs are pushing up the copper mining industry’s capital and operating costs.

Ore head grades decline over time as companies initially mine high-grade zones to recoup capital costs and other early expenditures. From 2001 to 2012, the weighted-average head grade at 47 producing mines with comparable data declined by almost 30 percent. Not only are head and reserve grades declining at existing mines, the average ore grades of copper in new discoveries and developing projects also declined over the period.

With declining ore grades exacerbated by increasing energy and other costs, and significant deposits being found at greater depths or in more remote areas, the average capital costs for copper production capacity in new mines increased an average of 15 percent per year over the past 20 years, with much of the increase evident since 2008. Cash operating costs at major mines also increased significantly, more than tripling over the past 10 years, to an average of almost $1.50/lb in 2012. Besides the costs of operating mines, companies had to find or purchase reserves to replace mined copper, build mines to replace exhausted ones, continually upgrade equipment, and pay treatment and refining charges. Net of administrative costs, a mining company had an average total cost of about $1.95/lb to replace reserves and produce copper during the period, increasing from about 76 cents/lb in 2003 to more than $3.30/lb in 2012.

Globally, 100 significant copper discoveries (defined as a deposit containing at least 500 kt (550,000 st) of copper in reserves, resources, and past production) have been reported so far in the 1998-2012 period, containing almost 395 Mt (435 million st) of copper. Benefiting from the largest share of discovery-oriented exploration budgets over the period, Latin America hosts more than half of the discovered copper, followed distantly by North America, Africa, Asia, Australia-Pacific and Europe.

Overall, the industry found more copper in these significant discoveries than it produced; however, the economic viability of new resources is influenced by factors such as location and politics, capital and operating costs, and market conditions that inevitably reduce the amount of copper that reaches production. To date, only about one-tenth of the copper in these 100 discoveries has been converted to reserves with only 15 deposits having reached production.

Meanwhile, the 22 major copper producers (those that mined at least 140 kt (154,000 st) of copper in 2012) replaced almost 300 percent of their copper production over the past 10 years. These producers also increased their aggregate annual production by 39 percent to 11.2 Mt (12.3 million st) in 2012, and held sufficient reserves for 36 years of production at 2012 rates. The majors’ increased production exacerbates their need to add reserves to maintain a steady production pipeline, however, and based on 2012 production these producers need to replace an average of at least 500 kt (550,000 st) of copper reserves each year, ranging from a high 1.8 Mt (2 million st) for Codelco to less than 142 kt (156,000 st) for Vedanta Resources.




Related article search: