ME home
  SME FaceBook SME Twitter SME LinkedIn RSS Feed

Subscriber or
SME Member Log On




USA Pavilion at Expomin 2018  - Exhibit
Apr 23, 2018 - Apr 27, 2018
Mozambique Mining Oil&Gas and Energy Conference  - Conference
Apr 25, 2018 - Apr 26, 2018
Good Samaritan Protection..Abandoned Mine Cleanup  - Seminar
Apr 26, 2018
Current Trends in Mining Finance  - Conference
Apr 29, 2018 - May 2, 2018



The Mining Engineering, SME and NSSGA
Online Buyers Directory Site
The Online Global Mining and Minerals Library Site

EPA ordered to consider impact of regulations on jobs
January 13, 2017

A district judge in West Virginia ordered the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to consider the how many power plant and coal mining jobs are being lost because of air pollution regulations.

Fox News reported that U.S. District Judge John Preston Bailey in West Virginia made the ruling on Jan. 11 after reviewing a response from outgoing EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy.

The EPA was previously ordered to consider the economic impact on a continuing basis of regulations such as the Clean Air Act as part of a lawsuit filed against the agency by Murray Energy Corp. McCarthy said it would take the agency up to two years to devise a methodology to use to try to comply. Bailey took exception to that response, calling it “wholly insufficient, unacceptable, and unnecessary.”

The judge said McCarthy's response is "evidences the continued hostility on the part of the EPA to acceptance of the mission established by Congress."

According to Fox News, Bailey ordered the EPA to identify facilities harmed by the regulations during the Obama presidency by July 1. That includes identifying facilities at risk of closure or reductions in employment.

The EPA had contended that analyzing job loss won't change global energy trends.

The judge also set a Dec. 31 deadline for the EPA to provide documentation on how it is continuously evaluating the loss and shifts in employment that may result from administration and enforcement of the Clean Air Act.

The EPA said it was reviewing the ruling, first reported by the Wheeling Intelligencer and News-Register.

Murray Energy and other coal companies have blamed thousands of layoffs this decade on President Obama's anti-global-warming push that imposes limits on carbon pollution from coal-fired power plants. The U.S. Supreme Court has delayed implementation of Obama's Clean Power Plan until legal challenges are resolved.

McCarthy has said no administration has interpreted federal law to require job impact analysis for rulemaking since 1977. She said the most that the EPA does is "conduct proactive analysis of the employment effects of our rulemaking actions," but that has not included investigating power plant and mine closures and worker dislocations on an ongoing basis, according to the order.

Bailey wrote that the EPA can recommend amendments to Congress if it feels strongly enough.

"EPA does not get to decide whether compliance with (the law) is good policy, or would lead to too many difficulties for the agency," Bailey wrote. "It is time for the EPA to recognize that Congress makes the law, and EPA must not only enforce the law, it must obey it."

President-elect Donald Trump, who has selected Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt to head the EPA, has promised to overturn many of the EPA's regulations on coal.

Pruitt has repeatedly sued the EPA since becoming Oklahoma's attorney general in 2011.


Related article search: