ME home
 
  SME FaceBook SME Twitter SME LinkedIn RSS Feed

Subscriber or
SME Member Log On

WEB-ONLY CONTENT

Go to SME eNEWS

MINING INDUSTRY EVENTS

WM2E 2017 Energy Tech Expo  - Exhibit
Dec 14, 2017 - Dec 16, 2017
George Fox Conference  - Conference
Jan 24, 2018
2018 SME Annual Conference & Expo  - Conference
Feb 25, 2018 - Feb 28, 2018
Mongolia Mining 2018  - Conference
Apr 4, 2018 - Apr 6, 2018

METAL PRICES


Au
Ag
Pt
Pd
Ni
Cu
Al
Pb

AGGREGATES
AND MINERALS
MARKETPLACE


http://aggregatesmineralsmarketplace.com
The Mining Engineering, SME and NSSGA
Online Buyers Directory Site
The Online Global Mining and Minerals Library Site

Report calls Gold King Mine spill preventable; blames EPA
October 22, 2015

An independent review of the waste water spill from the Gold King Mine in Colorado found that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was responsible for the spill and that the spill was preventable and preceded by conditions and actions that “are surprisingly prevalent” at abandoned mines.

The Denver Post reported that the 132-page Department of Interior report strays from an EPA internal review of the disaster in August that claimed the massive release was “inevitable.”

The Interior report highlights, specifically, that the EPA failed to understand impounded fluid in the mine and the ground water system affecting the Gold King area.

That “misinterpretation of the ground water conditions,” and the decision not to drill into the mine’s collapsed opening to test pressure, led to the massive release. Had the drilling been completed as it was at a nearby mine, the report says, the disaster would not have happened.

“Although this (drilling) was apparently considered at Gold King, it was not done,” according to the review. "Had it been done, the plan to open the mine would have been revised, and the blowout would not have occurred.”

The interior department's report also says the EPA also did not know the potential for disaster at the site and the possible environmental impacts downstream.

“The incident at Gold King Mine is somewhat emblematic of the current state of practice in abandoned mine remediation,” according to the report.

While there are various guidelines for mine reopening work, there is “little in actual written requirements that government agencies are required to follow,” the review said.

“San Juan Corp. agrees that the root cause of the blowout at the Gold King Mine began when the neighboring Sunnyside Mine mined the Gold King property and then blocked the flows of mine water from the American Tunnel of the Sunnyside Mine. That caused a very large amount of mine water to build up in Bonita Peak and flow out of neighboring properties,” said Todd Hnnies, owner of the Gold King Mine. “ We have been advised of an independent investigation that has determined via photographic evidence analysis that the actions of the E.P.A. in 2014 in piling a large amount of backfill material on the Gold King entrance blocked off the mine discharge pipe intakes. This action by the EPA resulted in a very large volume of water backing up in the Gold King Mine workings. The act of placing such a large amount of backfill on the entrance of the Gold King Mine also prevented the pressure of the water from clearing an outlet of the waters naturally.”

The 3 million-gallon spill above Silverton on Aug. 5 left the EPA facing immense criticism as yellow-orange contaminants flowed from the Animas River across the southwest. In the disaster's wake, the agency has been working to address the still-leaching mine and other area portals that are releasing contaminants.

The interior department's report was peer reviewed by the United States Geological Survey and Army Corps of Engineers.
 

Related article search: