ME home
 
  SME FaceBook SME Twitter SME LinkedIn RSS Feed

Subscriber or
SME Member Log On

WEB-ONLY CONTENT

Go to SME eNEWS

MINING INDUSTRY EVENTS

ALTA 2018 Nickel-Cobalt-Copper, Uranium-REE & Gold  - Conference
May 19, 2018 - May 26, 2018
Filtered, Paste & Thickened Tailings  - Seminar
Jun 5, 2018 - Jun 8, 2018
SMRI Spring 2018 Technical Conference  - Conference
Jun 17, 2018 - Jun 18, 2018
2018 North American Tunneling Conference  - Conference
Jun 24, 2018 - Jun 27, 2018

METAL PRICES


Au
Ag
Pt
Pd
Ni
Cu
Al
Pb

AGGREGATES
AND MINERALS
MARKETPLACE


http://aggregatesmineralsmarketplace.com
The Mining Engineering, SME and NSSGA
Online Buyers Directory Site
The Online Global Mining and Minerals Library Site
May 2018
Volume 70    Issue 5

Electromagnetic interference from personal dust monitors and other electronic devices with proximity detection systems

Mining Engineering, 2018, Vol. 70, No. 5, pp. 61-68
Noll, J.; Matetic, R.J.; Li, J.; Zhou, C.; DuCarme, J.; Reyes, M.; Srednicki, J.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19150/me.8237

ABSTRACT:

In April 2016, the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) began requiring the use of continuous personal dust monitors to monitor and measure respirable mine dust exposures to underground coal miners. Mines are currently using the PDM3700 personal dust monitor to comply with this regulation. After the PDM3700’s implementation, mine operators discovered that it interfered with proximity detection systems, thus exposing miners to potential striking and pinning hazards from continuous mining machines. Besides the PDM3700, other electronic devices were also previously reported to interfere with proximity detection systems. MSHA sought the aid of the U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and mining industry stakeholders to determine how the PDM3700 and some other electronic devices and proximity detection systems interact with each other. Accordingly, NIOSH investigated existing standards, developed test protocols, designed experiments and conducted laboratory evaluations. Some interferences were observed to be caused by electromagnetic interference from some electronic devices, including the PDM3700. Results showed that there was no significant interference when the PDM3700, as well as other electronic devices, and the miner-wearable component of the proximity detection system were separated by distances of 15 cm (6 in.) or greater. In the present study, it was found that the PDM3700 and the personal alarm device needed to be at least 15 cm (6 in.) apart in order for them to be used simultaneously and reduce potential interference.



Please login to access this article.

OR

If you are not an SME member, you can join SME by clicking the button below.