ME home
 
  SME FaceBook SME Twitter SME LinkedIn RSS Feed

Subscriber or
SME Member Log On

WEB-ONLY CONTENT

Go to SME eNEWS

MINING INDUSTRY EVENTS

Solution Mining SMRI Fall Technical Conference  - Conference
Sep 24, 2017 - Sep 27, 2017
SME Florida Section 32nd Annual Conference  - Conference
Oct 11, 2017 - Oct 12, 2017
10th Edition of Great Step  - Conference
Oct 13, 2017 - Oct 15, 2017
AusIMM Underground Operators Conference  - Conference
Oct 16, 2017 - Oct 18, 2017

METAL PRICES


Au
Ag
Pt
Pd
Ni
Cu
Al
Pb

AGGREGATES
AND MINERALS
MARKETPLACE


http://aggregatesmineralsmarketplace.com
The Mining Engineering, SME and NSSGA
Online Buyers Directory Site
The Online Global Mining and Minerals Library Site
October 2016
Volume 68    Issue 10

Refuge alternatives relief valve testing and design

Mining Engineering, 2016, Vol. 68, No. 10, pp. 55-59
Lutz, T.J.; Bissert, P.T.; Homce, G.T.; Yonkey, J.A.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19150/me.6802

ABSTRACT:

?The U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has been researching refuge alternatives (RAs) since 2007. RAs typically have built-in pressure relief valves (PRVs) to prevent the unit from reaching unsafe pressures. The U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration requires that these valves vent the chamber at a maximum pressure of 1.25 kPa (0.18 psi, 5.0 in. H2O), or as specified by the manufacturer, above mine atmospheric pressure in the RA. To facilitate PRV testing, an instrumented benchtop test fixture was developed using an off-the-shelf centrifugal blower and ductwork. Relief pressures and flow characteristics were measured for three units: (1) a modified polyvinyl chloride check valve, (2) an off-the-shelf brass/cast-iron butterfly check valve and (3) a commercially available valve that was designed specifically for one manufacturer’s steel prefabricated RAs and had been adapted for use in one mine operator’s built-in-place RA. PRVs used in tent-style RAs were not investigated. The units were tested with different modifications and configurations in order to check compliance with Title 30 Code of Federal Regulations, or 30 CFR, regulations. The commercially available relief valve did not meet the 30 CFR relief pressure specification but may meet the manufacturer’s specification. Alternative valve designs were modified to meet the 30 CFR relief pressure specification, but all valve designs will need further design research to examine survivability in the event of a 103 kPa (15.0 psi) impulse overpressure during a disaster.



Please login to access this article.

OR

If you are not an SME member, you can join SME by clicking the button below.